27:53-94.
Schachter,Paul,1976.The subject in Philippine languages:Topic,actor,actor-topic,or none of
the above.In:Charles N.Li,ed.,1976,493-518.
Teng,Shou-Hsin,1979,Remarks on cleft sentences in Chinese.Journal of Chinese Linguistics 7:
101-114.
Tsao,Feng-Fu,1990.Sentence and clause structure in Chinese:Afunctional Perspective.Taipei:S
tudent Book Co.
Van Dijk,Teun,1977.Text and context:Explorations in thesemantics and pragmatics of discours
e.London:Longman.
Van Dijk,Teun,1981.Studies in the pragmatics of discourse.TheHague:Mouton.
Van Oosten,Jeanne,1986.The nature of subjects,topic and agents:A cognitive explanation.Bloo
mington,In:Indiana UniversityLinguistics Club.
Xu,Liejiong and D.Terence Langendoen,1985.Topic structures in Chinese.Language 61:1-27.
注释：
* 非常感谢Sandra A.Thompson在旅欧期间，百忙中抽空看了本文的初稿，并提出了详细的意见。感谢O
ne-Soon Her，李行德，孙朝奋，徐烈炯和徐云扬，他们在我研究汉语话题结构时给予的各种帮助。还要感谢
Malcom Skewis的帮助。本文的撰写也得到昆士兰大学专项研究计划基金的赞助。我本人对本文所有的观点负
责。——作者
原文题目是Pragmatic interpretations of structural topicsand relativization in Chinese，刊于
Journal of Pragmatics（语用学杂志）1996年第3期。——译者
① 句法功能的这个“可及性等级”就是“主语＜宾语＜旁语”——译注通讯地址：陈平 Department
of Asian Languages and Studies
The University of Queensland
Brisbane,QLD 4072
Australia
徐赳赳 100732 北京建内大街5号 中国社会科学院语言所
|
